Jupiter vs Arcus: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Jupiter and Arcus on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Jupiter | Arcus |
|---|
| 24h volume | $640M | $75M |
| Maker fee | 0 bps | n/a |
| Taker fee | 6 bps | n/a |
| Max leverage | 100x | 50x |
| Model | AMM / Pool | Orderbook |
| Chain | Solana | Robinhood Chain (Arbitrum L2) |
| Token | $JUP | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto, Commodities, Stocks |
Jupiter vs Arcus: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Jupiter wins on taker fees (6 bps). For maximum leverage, Jupiter goes up to 100x. For depth and liquidity, Jupiter trades the most volume of the two.
Jupiter runs a amm / pool on Solana, while Arcus runs a orderbook on Robinhood Chain (Arbitrum L2). Read the full profiles: Jupiter and Arcus.
FAQ
- Is Jupiter or Arcus cheaper?
- Jupiter has the lower taker fee (6 bps vs n/a). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Jupiter or Arcus?
- Jupiter offers more, up to 100x, versus 50x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Jupiter or Arcus?
- Jupiter has more listed 24h volume ($640M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.