Aster vs Pacifica: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Aster and Pacifica on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Aster | Pacifica |
|---|
| 24h volume | $1.20B | $522M |
| Maker fee | 0.8 bps | 0.75 bps |
| Taker fee | 3.5 bps | 2 bps |
| Max leverage | 100x | 50x |
| Model | Orderbook | Orderbook |
| Chain | BNB, Ethereum, Solana | Solana |
| Token | $ASTER | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
Aster vs Pacifica: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Pacifica wins on taker fees (2 bps). For maximum leverage, Aster goes up to 100x. For depth and liquidity, Aster trades the most volume of the two.
Aster runs a orderbook on BNB, Ethereum, Solana, while Pacifica runs a orderbook on Solana. Read the full profiles: Aster and Pacifica.
FAQ
- Is Aster or Pacifica cheaper?
- Pacifica has the lower taker fee (2 bps vs 3.5 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Aster or Pacifica?
- Aster offers more, up to 100x, versus 50x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Aster or Pacifica?
- Aster has more listed 24h volume ($1.20B), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.