Jupiter vs GMX: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Jupiter and GMX on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Jupiter | GMX |
|---|
| 24h volume | $640M | $175M |
| Maker fee | 0 bps | 4 bps |
| Taker fee | 6 bps | 6 bps |
| Max leverage | 100x | 100x |
| Model | AMM / Pool | Pool |
| Chain | Solana | Arbitrum |
| Token | $JUP | $GMX |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto |
Jupiter vs GMX: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Jupiter wins on taker fees (6 bps). For maximum leverage, Jupiter goes up to 100x. For depth and liquidity, Jupiter trades the most volume of the two.
Jupiter runs a amm / pool on Solana, while GMX runs a pool on Arbitrum. Read the full profiles: Jupiter and GMX.
FAQ
- Is Jupiter or GMX cheaper?
- Jupiter has the lower taker fee (6 bps vs 6 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Jupiter or GMX?
- Jupiter offers more, up to 100x, versus 100x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Jupiter or GMX?
- Jupiter has more listed 24h volume ($640M), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.