Wiki › Hyperliquid vs Vest
Hyperliquid vs Vest: which perp DEX is better?
A side-by-side comparison of Hyperliquid and Vest on fees, leverage, volume, chain and token.
| Hyperliquid | Vest |
|---|
| 24h volume | $2.90B | n/a |
| Maker fee | 1.5 bps | 0 bps |
| Taker fee | 4.5 bps | 0 bps |
| Max leverage | 50x | 50x |
| Model | Orderbook | Pool |
| Chain | Hyperliquid L1 | zkRisk appchain |
| Token | $HYPE | No token |
| Assets | Crypto | Crypto, Stocks, Forex |
Hyperliquid vs Vest: which should you choose?
If your priority is cost, Vest wins on taker fees (0 bps). For maximum leverage, Hyperliquid goes up to 50x. For depth and liquidity, Hyperliquid trades the most volume of the two.
Hyperliquid runs a orderbook on Hyperliquid L1, while Vest runs a pool on zkRisk appchain. Read the full profiles: Hyperliquid and Vest.
FAQ
- Is Hyperliquid or Vest cheaper?
- Vest has the lower taker fee (0 bps vs 4.5 bps). Funding rates also affect total cost, so check both before trading.
- Which has higher leverage, Hyperliquid or Vest?
- Hyperliquid offers more, up to 50x, versus 50x. Higher leverage means higher liquidation risk.
- Which is bigger, Hyperliquid or Vest?
- Hyperliquid has more listed 24h volume ($2.90B), which usually means deeper liquidity and less slippage.
More comparisons
Not financial advice. Volume figures are compiled from each venue's public data on our
live rankings and may lag; fees, leverage and token status are curated and can change. Always verify on the exchange before trading. Perpetual futures are high risk and leverage can liquidate your position.